|
|
|
|
| PRO-JECT
Debut II Turntable |
| Manual
turntable with fitted cartridge |
| |
|
|
|
|
| Good
sound from sound technology |
|
|
• |
Steel
platter with felt mat and low-tolerance chrome-plated stainless-steel
axle runs on a polished ball bearing in a brass bearing
housing |
• |
Headshell
and armtube formed from a single aluminium workpiece, rotation
allows adjustment of needle azimuth despite fixed headshell |
• |
Motor
decoupled to reduce vibration |
• |
Tonearm
bearing comprises inverted hardened stainless-steel points |
|
|
|
 |
|
| FEATURES |
| |
|
| • |
Supplied
with Ortofon OM 5E cartridge fitted |
| • |
Available
in matt black, glossy black, glossy white, silver, red,
yellow, blue, green and champagne |
| • |
Dust
cover |
|
| |
| PRO-JECT
Phonobox |
| MM/MC Phono Pre-amplifier |
|
| |
 |
| |
| • |
Metal
case shields the electronics from vibrational and electromagnetic
interference |
| • |
Outboard
power supply included |
| • |
Small
size allows installation close to record player |
| • |
Optimal channel separation
through dual-mono circuitry |
| • |
Special low-noise ICs
used |
| • |
Gold plated RCA connection
sockets |
| |
| Pro-Ject
PhonoBox - Phono Preamp |
| PAYDAY
- The Review |
|
| |
Product:
Pro-Ject PhonoBox - phono preamp
Manufacturer: Pro-Ject Audio Designs
- Austria
Approx. price: 90 $/Euro
Reviewer: Lucio Cadeddu - TNT Italy
Reviewed: June, 2003 |
| |
Despite
the assault of brave new hi-res digital formats
it seems vinyl playback is here to stay. The amount
of new HiFi components devoted to LP playback is
rapidly increasing: new turntables, cartridges,
arms and ... phono preamps. For those on a tight
budget the choice has never been wider: the NAD
PP-1, the GramAmp 1 & 2, the KAB PH-1 and a
few others. One of these is the ProJect PhonoBox,
a basic sub-100$/Euro phono preamp, built by Pro-Ject
Audio Designs, famous for making affordable and
good sounding turntables.
Technically, the PhonoBox is a dual-mono MM/MC non-adjustable
phono preamp with an outboard power supply. It makes
use of a pair of JRC 4580D op-amps (one for each
channel) and mid-quality passive components. A bettered
version, the PhonoBox SE, is available, as is a
tube-equipped one, the Tube Box, at a (way) higher
cost.
The quality of the construction is good, considering
the price tag, while the dual-mono structure is
something quite rare at this cost. I've listened
to the PhonoBox for a couple of months in my B system,
then I've compared it to the NAD PP-1 I had already
reviewed for TNT-Audio and then to the Lehmann Black
Cube SE + PWX. |
| |
| These are the
most relevant (claimed) tech specs: |
| • |
S/N ratio:
88 dB (MM) - 79 dB (MC) |
| • |
Output
voltage: 200 mV for 5mV @ 1 kHz (MM) - 0.45
mV (MC) |
| • |
THD: <
0.005% |
| • |
Frequency
response: 20 Hz - 20 kHz (± 0.5 dB) |
| • |
Input
impedance: 47 kohm/100 pF (MM input) - 100 ohm/100
pF (MC input) |
| • |
Gain:
32 dB (MM), 53 dB (MC) |
| • |
Power
consumption: 40 mA AC |
| • |
Outboard
power supply: 16V/200 mA |
| • |
Size:
cm 11.2 (W) x 11.5 (D) x 3.0 (H) |
| • |
Weight:
280 g (without power supply) |
|
| |
| Payday... |
| |
Of
course you can't expect the performance of top-class
phono preamps here...but the PhonoBox has been quite
a surprise. Its tonal balance tends to be slightly
on the warm side, with soft treble and slightly
overblown mid-bass and bass. This equilibrium certainly
helps to counterbalance the natural attitude of
those cheap turntables and carts, to which the PhonoBox
will be eventually connected to. Indeed, the PhonoBox
can add some weight to the bass response of weak
turntables and cartridges and at the same time it
can "tame" some harshness in the highs.
The final result is quite enjoyable and never fatiguing.
Compared to the NAD PP-1, its natural rival, the
PhonoBox appears more refined in the highs, cleaner
and weightier in the bass. If you have read my review
of the NAD PP-1 you should already know I don't
like this preamp much. I feel the PhonoBox is globally
better, though - perhaps - less aggressive than
the PP-1. |
| |
Considering
the dynamic performance, the two preamps are almost
equal, a bit slow and compressed, when compared
with the Black Cube. They both lack that "spark"
that makes vinyl sound so lively even when compared
to the best digital gear. Somehow, it seems that
Music slows down, attacks and decays appear less
sharp than they should be. This attitude becomes
clear with drums and electric bass, for example
in the opening of "Too Soon" by Daryle
Ryce (Rosa's Grandchild, 1992, Appaloosa AP063-I):
the natural violence of the drum kit, mated to a
slappy bass, appears to be reduced, and not by a
small extent. The NAD PP-1 doesn't perform any better,
in this area. I'm afraid one has to pay a bit more
to fully enjoy the dynamic potential of good vinyl... |
| |
Please
bear in mind I've not used my hi-end playback system
to evaluate these preamps, just a mid-class TT:
ERA deck, tweaked with TNT Janus mat, C37 lacquer,
antivibration feet, plus an Esoter arm and an Acutex
420 STR cartridge. OK, I admit, not exactly run-of-the-mill
stuff :-). This means the REAL limitation, especially
in terms of dynamic capabilities, lies in the phono
preamps. When upgrading your vinyl playback system,
plan to spend some cash on a better phono stage,
instead of getting a better cartridge, for example. |
| |
I've
also tried to evaluate the PhonoBox (and the PP-1)
with respect to the reproduction of a realistic
soundstage, one of the areas where vinyl is known
to be an excellent performer. Well, while the PP-1
is quite poor at soundstaging, the Pro-Ject PhonoBox
does slightly better, being able to create even
some sense of depth. It still fails to have a good
"focus" and stability but the overall
3D performance can't be criticized much, considering
the price. Perhaps the dual mono structure plays
a role, here. At 90$/Euro I wasn't certainly expecting
to get a reasonable soundstage, that's for sure!
Summarizing, the soundstage isn't exactly wide nor
deep but still some sense of "proportion"
is preserved and, as said, there's even DEPTH!!! |
| |
At
the end of it all I think the PhonoBox is a better
preamp than the NAD PP-1. In few words, it is more
refined, has a better tonal balance and soundstage.
It could be considered a serious first step in the
world of vinyl playback, especially if partnered
with entry-level turntables and cartridges. |
| |
| Some
advice |
| |
As
the PhonoBox uses an outboard power transformer,
equipped with a long umbilical cord, try to keep
this as far as possible from the turntable and the
preamp itself. Actually, it should be better to
place the preamp as close as possible to the turntable
(but FAR from the motor). |
| |
The
PhonoBox has two pairs of gold-plated input/output
RCA's. This means you are free to use any interconnect
you prefer, a good plus, if you consider the NAD
PP-1 had a fixed (inboard installed) non-replaceable
interconnects. Of course, do not forget this preamp
is really inexpensive so using extremely good cables
is a pure non-sense. DIY makes sense, here. |
| |
The
unit has been designed to stay permanently on. Switching
from MM to MC is quite easy, if you read the manual.
Actually one has to move a couple of jumpers on
the main board. Following the schematic drawed on
the bottom of the unit isn't the easiest task one
can imagine. Refer to the manual if you want to
avoid silly mistakes ;-) [a complete PDF manual
is available at the Pro-Ject website]. |
| |
The
PhonoBox has a pretty resonant top cover. Try adding
a damping sheet (outside or inside, it doesn't matter)
and placing the unit on very soft feet, possibly
even a mouse pad would do the trick. |
| |
| Complaints |
| |
For
this price one can't honestly ask for more. Only,
I'd have preferred to get some kind of "adjustability",
especially for the MC impedance input load (100
ohm) and for the capacitance of the MM input (100
pF). Two or three different values would have been
more than enough. Also, considering the target (low-cost
vinyl playback systems) the MC option is really
useless. How many audiophiles with a MC cartdridge
will be using a 90$ phono preamp? Not many, I'm
afraid. So, perhaps, a better quality MM-only phono
preamp would make more sense. |
| |
The
sound of the PhonoBox has been a pleasant surprise,
considering my attitude versus cheap analogue gear.
The most severe limitation can be detected in the
reduced rythmic capability, partnered with mediocre
overall dynamics. |
| |
| Conclusions |
| |
If
you're in the market for an inexpensive vinyl playback
system and your preamp / integrated amp doesn't
have a phono input, please take this PhonoBox into
serious account. |
| |
| © Copyright
2003 Lucio Cadeddu - www.tnt-audio.com |
|
|
|
|